Case 1302132/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Hanson (in person) For the v Mr D Cole (lay representative) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302132/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Hanson (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Kenward, held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and therefore found that Fordbridge Town Council unfairly dismissed Mr S Hanson. No other causes of action were recorded in the judgment, and the liability finding was expressed in straightforward terms without further factual narrative in the written reasons.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered compensation totalling £1,060.41. The basic award was assessed at £1,185.75 before a 50% reduction for conduct, resulting in £592.88. The compensatory award was assessed by reference to a prescribed element for loss of earnings from 23 December 2021 to 25 January 2022 and a non-prescribed element for loss of statutory rights.
The prescribed element was calculated at £767.92 before adjustments and reduced to £331.16 after a 50% Polkey reduction, a 15% uplift for the respondent's failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary procedures, and a further 25% reduction on the basis that the dismissal was caused or contributed to by the claimant's actions. The non-prescribed element was calculated at £316.20 before the same adjustments and reduced to £136.37. The final compensatory award was £467.53.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded. Compensation was ordered in the total sum of £1,060.41. | Upheld | — | £1,060 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,060
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £593
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £468
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Polkey v A E Dayton Services Limited
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.