Case 1302134/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Esmeralda Palmieri Jonuzi v Robin Lloyd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302134/2023
- Decision date
- 21 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy KC
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Esmeralda Palmieri Jonuzi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Esmeralda Palmieri Jonuzi, pursued a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages only against the respondent, Robin Lloyd. The hearing took place at Birmingham via CVP on 21 November 2023 before Employment Judge Algazy KC. The claimant was represented by Mr E. Balli, solicitor, and the respondent appeared in person.
The tribunal held that the unauthorised deductions from wages claim was not well founded and dismissed it. The judgment does not set out detailed reasons in the extracted text, beyond recording the dismissal. It also states that, insofar as may be necessary, all other claims were dismissed.
No monetary award was made. The judgment notes that oral reasons were given and refers the parties to Rule 62(3) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 regarding written reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant advanced a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages only. The tribunal found the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. It also stated that, insofar as necessary, all other claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.