Case 1302137/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v George Birchall Services Ltd (in Administration) and George Birchall Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1302137/2019
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 4 January 2024, Employment Judge Wedderspoon considered claims 1302137/2019 and 1302121/2019. The tribunal refused the claimant's application to reconsider the earlier judgment that had struck out claim 1302137/2019.
The tribunal also found that claim 1302121/2019 had been brought outside the relevant limitation period and that it was reasonably feasible to bring it in time. That claim was dismissed. No monetary remedy was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only states that the claimant's application to reconsider the earlier strike-out of claim 1302137/2019 was refused; the underlying claim type is not specified in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The extracted text does not identify the underlying claim type; the tribunal found claim 1302121/2019 was out of time and that it was reasonably feasible to bring it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.