Case 1302148/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R White v Ventnor Marina Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302148/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Connolly, sitting alone in Birmingham on 20 and 21 January 2020, found that Mr R White had been unfairly dismissed. The written judgment states that his claim of unfair dismissal succeeds.
The tribunal reduced any basic and/or compensatory award by 65% to reflect the claimant’s own conduct and its contribution to his dismissal. It also ordered Ventnor Marina Limited to pay Mr White £700, recorded as a sum agreed between the parties, and stated that no part of that sum included loss of earnings for the notice period. The judgment further records that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that his claim of unfair dismissal succeeds. It also records that any basic and/or compensatory award is reduced by 65% for the claimant’s own conduct and contribution to the dismissal, and separately orders payment of £700 agreed between the parties, but it does not allocate that sum to a specific adjudicated claim or state a quantified dismissal award. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.