Case 1302150/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Bonner-King v Laura Ella Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302150/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Bonner-King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal recorded that Laura Ella Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms M Bonner-King's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,500 net, expressed in the judgment as £1,350 plus financial loss of £150.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £630 net in respect of that holiday pay claim.
The total sum due was stated as £2,130 net. The judgment does not record any separate split beyond the two sums awarded for wages and holiday entitlement, and it does not set out any additional remedy elements.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,500 net, described as £1,350 plus financial loss of £150. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £630 net. | Upheld | — | £630 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,130
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.