Case 1302180/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MR GIOVANNI SCANU v Jisa Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302180/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ali Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR GIOVANNI SCANU
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Giovanni Scanu, brought claims against JISA Ltd for unauthorised deduction of wages, failure to pay notice pay, failure to pay holiday pay, and a separate claim for "Other payments". The hearing took place at Birmingham Employment Tribunal via CVP before Employment Judge Ali on 15 November 2022. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the claims for unauthorised deduction of wages, notice pay, and holiday pay because they were presented outside the applicable time limit. It found it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented in time and therefore the time limit could not be extended. On that basis, the tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear those claims.
The claim for "Other payments" was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment states that, for the avoidance of doubt, all of the claimant's claims in case number 1302180/2022 were dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim dismissed; the tribunal held the claims were presented outside the applicable time limit and that it was not reasonably practicable for the time limit to be extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for failure to pay notice pay was dismissed for the same time-limit reason and the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for failure to pay holiday pay was dismissed; the tribunal found it was out of time and outside its jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim for "Other payments" was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.