Case 1302182/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Turner v Western Mortgage Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302182/2022
- Decision date
- 24 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 24 March 2023 at Birmingham Employment Tribunal via CVP, Employment Judge Noons issued a short judgment disposing of two claims only. The tribunal struck out the claimant’s claim in relation to non-payment under the respondent’s PHI scheme.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant’s claim for non-payment of employer pension contributions was not struck out. No substantive reasons, findings on liability, or monetary award were set out in the written record. The notes state that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claimant’s claim in relation to non-payment under the respondent’s PHI scheme. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claim for non-payment of employer pension contributions was not struck out. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.