Case 1302193/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs K Ragouba v Washwood Healthcare Ltd t/a Wellbeing Pharmacy — 2019

Case reference: 1302193/2018
Decision date: 10 September 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Wynn-Evans Representation
Venue: Birmingham

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs K Ragouba

Respondent

Washwood Healthcare Ltd t/a Wellbeing Pharmacy

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal, sitting at Birmingham on 10 September 2019 before Employment Judge Wynn-Evans, considered the claimant's complaints of unlawful disability discrimination against Washwood Healthcare Ltd t/a Wellbeing Pharmacy. The judgment records that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time.

Because the claimant was found not to have the protected characteristic of disability at the material time, the tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination complaints. The judgment does not record any separate remedy award, and no monetary figures are stated in the decision text provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, so her complaints of unlawful disability discrimination were dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.