Case 1302201/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Pagano v Korey’s Bar and Grill Limited Heard: by CVP in Birmingham — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302201/2023
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Pagano
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment in which the respondent, Korey’s Bar and Grill Limited, did not attend. Employment Judge Codd determined the claim on 13 September 2023 in Birmingham by CVP.
The tribunal found for the claimant under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered the respondent to pay £135 gross. The judgment states that this amount comprised £115 for non-payment of wages and £20 for unlawful deductions from wages.
The tribunal directed that appropriate tax and national insurance deductions be made and paid to HMRC before the net amount was sent to the claimant, using the 2022/23 tax year.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that, pursuant to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the respondent shall pay £135 gross. It says this sum comprises £115 non-payment of wages and £20 unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £135
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.