Case 1302220/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steven Tocock (1) and Mr Jordan Marvin (2) v GED Solutions Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1302220/2022
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steven Tocock (1) and Mr Jordan Marvin (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard oral evidence from both claimants at a remote hearing on 1 December 2022. The respondent did not attend. Judge Mensah gave an oral judgment at the hearing and the written record notes that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal held that the claims for unlawful deduction of wages were well founded. It ordered GED Solutions Limited to pay Mr Steven Tocock £2,418.95 gross and Mr Jordan Marvin £1,995.00 gross, in each case subject to any appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Steven Tocock: the tribunal found the unlawful deduction of wages claim well founded and ordered payment of £2,418.95 gross, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £2,419 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Jordan Marvin: the tribunal found the unlawful deduction of wages claim well founded and ordered payment of £1,995.00 gross, subject to appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,995 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,414
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.