Case 1302252/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Vickers (A lay person and family friend of the claimant) For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302252/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R Vickers (A lay person and family friend of the claimant) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final merits hearing was held at Birmingham remotely by the Cloud Video Platform on 25 to 27 November 2020 before Employment Judge Perry sitting alone. The claimant was represented by Mr R Vickers, described in the judgment as a lay person and family friend of the claimant, and the respondent was represented by counsel, Mr R Ryan.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint as not well founded. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasoning, but it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal also dismissed the wrongful dismissal complaint. It found that the respondent was entitled to dismiss the claimant summarily and without notice. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.