Case 1302298/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Altaf v Homeserve Membership Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302298/2019
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Altaf
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a withdrawal judgment under rule 52. It records that Mr U Altaf was the claimant and Homeserve Membership Ltd was the respondent, and that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the unfair dismissal, breach of contract, public interest disclosure, race discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, or working time matters identified in the listing categories. No remedy was awarded or assessed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or outcomes for individual listed claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or outcomes for individual listed claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or outcomes for individual listed claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or outcomes for individual listed claims. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or outcomes for individual listed claims. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or outcomes for individual listed claims. |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.