Case 1302300/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr M Boxhall, Managing Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302300/2020
- Decision date
- 4 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment at a preliminary hearing by telephone before Employment Judge Lloyd on 4 May 2020. The parties agreed that the respondent would pay the claimant £300.00 forthwith in full and final settlement of all claims arising out of case number 1302300/2020.
The judgment does not contain findings on liability, statutory tests, or a merits determination. It records only the parties' agreement and the amount to be paid.
No separate remedy breakdown was given. The only monetary figure recorded is the single settlement sum of £300.00, which appears to dispose of the proceedings in full.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment: the respondent agreed to pay £300 in full and final settlement of all claims arising out of the proceedings. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment: the respondent agreed to pay £300 in full and final settlement of all claims arising out of the proceedings. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.