Case 1302318/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A West v PCT Engineering Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302318/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton Appearances
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A West
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr A West was unfairly dismissed. The respondent, PCT Engineering Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation), did not attend the hearing by CVP on 27 February 2023, and the judgment also records that the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written Statement of Employment Particulars.
The respondent was ordered to pay compensation in the sum of £4,445. The judgment specifies that this figure includes a basic award of £820 and an award of £1,640 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The tribunal also stated that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Breach of the duty to provide a written Statement of Employment Particulars; the judgment records an award of £1,640 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,445
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £820
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.