Case 1302394/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Christian v Vocare Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302394/2019
- Decision date
- 7 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr RW White, Mr J Reeves
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Christian
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham on 1 to 7 September 2020 before Employment Judge Meichen with Mr RW White and Mr J Reeves, held that Ms S Christian’s claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. The written judgment does not set out the underlying findings in detail, but it records that the unfair dismissal claim was brought on a constructive basis and that it was upheld.
The tribunal also decided that the direct race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. No separate findings of remedy are recorded in the written decision, and the judgment states that a remedy and costs hearing would be listed separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Judgment states that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeds. The written record does not set out any remedy figure because remedy and costs were listed for a separate hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the direct race discrimination claim fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.