Case 1302405/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Adams v Vale Royal Clinical Commissioning Group — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302405/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Adams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The only substantive disposition recorded is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings on the merits of the underlying complaint are set out in the extracted text, and no financial award is recorded. The judgment is signed by Employment Judge Hindmarch on 26 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits determination is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.