Case 1302454/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Butler v Tenstar GG Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302454/2022
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Butler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 13 May 2022 and sent to the respondent at its registered office on 17 May 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response in time and did not reply to the Tribunal's letter of 13 July 2022 warning that rule 21 applied. Employment Judge Camp therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and the hearing listed for 11 August 2022 was cancelled.
On the unlawful deductions claim, the tribunal found that Tenstar GG Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the amount of those deductions, assessed at £672.00.
The tribunal also found that, throughout the claimant's employment from 23 September 2021, the respondent had failed to provide written itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the particulars which should have been included were gross pay of £240 per week. No separate monetary award is stated for the pay statement issue in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £672.00. | Upheld | — | £672 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed throughout the claimant's employment, from 23 September 2021, to provide written itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 ERA 1996. It recorded that the particulars that ought to have been included were gross pay of £240 per week, but it did not state a separate monetary award for this issue. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £672
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.