Case 1302458/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Smith & others (see attached schedule) v AGL Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1302458/2021
- Decision date
- 6 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr L Smith & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns case number 1302458/2021 and the other cases listed in the schedule against AGL Realisations Ltd (in liquidation), Topshop/Topman Ltd (in liquidation), and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. The tribunal noted that by letter dated 17 July 2024 it had given the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Batten ordered that the claims be struck out. The judgment was dated 2 August 2024 and sent to the parties on 6 August 2024. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action; it records that the claims in the listed cases were struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.