Case 1302484/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Clarke v Marks and Spencer plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302484/2022
- Decision date
- 25 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant resigned after raising grievances about his move to the Sears store, including induction and training, workplace interactions, staffing, stacking of goods, sickness absence handling, and delay in dealing with his grievances. The tribunal accepted that the Claimant did not receive the Respondent's grievance acknowledgement letters and that communication about internal steps could have been better, but found that the Respondent was actively seeking appropriate managers and investigating the matters raised.
The tribunal found that the first grievance took longer than the Respondent's policy would normally envisage, but accepted the explanations for delay and noted that the grievance involved multiple allegations, witnesses and documents. The investigation was described as thorough and reasonable, and the grievance was partly upheld on some points, including lack of evidence that requested training on daily checks had been delivered.
Considering the alleged last straw and the earlier matters individually and cumulatively, the tribunal found no repudiatory breach of contract and no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The Claimant was therefore not constructively dismissed, and the complaint was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the complaint as constructive unfair dismissal and concludes that the complaint of constructive dismissal was not well founded and was not upheld. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- implied term of trust and confidence
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- Bournemouth University Higher Education Corporation v Buckland
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- WA Goold (Pearmak) Ltd v McConnell
- Sewar v SKF (UK) Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.