Case 1302492/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Perminder Kundi v Stepway CIO — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302492/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs E Shenton, Ms S Outwin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Perminder Kundi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused permission to amend the claim to add allegations that the claimant had not been paid national minimum wage and had not taken any holiday during his employment. It then found that Mr Perminder Kundi was unfairly dismissed and wrongfully dismissed by Stepway CIO.
The tribunal also found that there was no percentage chance that the claimant could have been fairly dismissed. It found that the claimant contributed to his dismissal by his blameworthy conduct and applied a 10% deduction to the compensatory award for contributory conduct.
The written judgment says that the other claims brought by the claimant failed and were dismissed, but it does not set them out individually in the reasons provided. The tribunal ordered payment of two weeks' notice pay of £269.24, a basic award of £269.24, loss of statutory rights of £500, and a compensatory award of £5,128.82, producing a grand total of £6,167.28. It also recorded that the recoupment provisions do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and also found there was no percentage chance that he could have been fairly dismissed; the written reasons do not split the remedy by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed. The written reasons award notice pay but do not allocate the monetary figures separately by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the other claims brought by the claimant fail and are dismissed, but it does not identify those claims individually in the written reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,167
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £269
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,129
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.