Case 1302519/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Turnbull v Car Vehicle Deliveries Limited and 1 other — 2017
- Case reference
- 1302519/2017
- Decision date
- 6 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Turnbull
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Dimbylow found that the respondents, Car Vehicle Deliveries Limited and Rigil Kent Group Limited, had made unlawful deductions from Mr C Turnbull’s wages. The judgment did not determine the period or amount of the deduction on the paperwork before the tribunal.
The tribunal kept the hearing listed for 29 January 2018, but directed that it would be for remedy only. Mr Turnbull was ordered to provide further written information by 4pm on 17 November 2017 identifying the period of the claim and the gross amount he said was due. The tribunal stated that, once that information was received, it would consider whether to issue a remedy judgment on the papers and cancel the further hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the respondents had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was to be dealt with at the listed hearing unless the tribunal later decided otherwise on the paperwork. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.