Case 1302520/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ann Boyd v Wendy Cartlidge t/a life Matters Personal Assistants — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302520/2022
- Decision date
- 20 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ann Boyd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAnn Boyd’s redundancy payment claim was found well founded and she was awarded £3,240. The tribunal also upheld her breach of contract claim. On that claim, it awarded £2,160 for notice pay and £3,237 for accrued untaken holiday pay.
The tribunal further found that the claim for accrued untaken annual leave under the statutory scheme was well founded and succeeded, but it made no separate award on that claim. The total awarded to the claimant was £8,637. The judgment is brief and does not set out any detailed reasoning beyond recording that each claim was well founded and specifying the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the redundancy payment claim well founded and awarded £3,240. | Upheld | — | £3,240 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim succeeded. The award comprised £2,160 notice pay and £3,237 accrued untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £5,397 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued untaken annual leave under the statutory scheme succeeded, but the tribunal made no separate award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,637
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.