Case 1302552/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Marsh-O’Connor v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302552/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Marsh-O’Connor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 because the respondent had not presented a response and the available material was sufficient. The respondent's administrators had consented to the claim continuing.
The tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Hainge Park, Tividale, Oldbury depot, and that the claimant was among the affected employees. It found there was no recognised independent trade union for the claimant's employee description, no existing representatives with authority to consult, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes because the respondent did not invite elections.
The tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 consultation requirements and had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable. Having found no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, it made the maximum protective award of 90 days' remuneration beginning on 9 May 2022. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements. The judgment made a protective award equivalent to 90 days' remuneration, but did not state a monetary amount. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(3) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 292A
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.