Case 1302579/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Meredith v The Community Housing Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1302579/2018
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs Forrest, Mr Murray
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Meredith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 28 and 29 October 2019, Employment Judge Cookson sat with Mrs Forrest and Mr Murray to hear Mr N Meredith's claims against The Community Housing Group Limited. The tribunal's written decision records a unanimous outcome only, without setting out reasons in the public extract.
The tribunal held that the claimant was fairly dismissed, so his claim for unfair dismissal under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. It also found that the claimant's claim for unlawful age discrimination was not proven and was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was fairly dismissed and dismissed his unfair dismissal claim under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for unlawful age discrimination was not proven and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.