Case 1302673/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Andy Butler and others (see schedule) v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302673/2022
- Decision date
- 6 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andy Butler and others (see schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a response and the administrators consented to the claims continuing. It found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at or connected with its Hainge Park, Tividale, Oldbury depot, and that the claimants were dismissed as redundant on 9 May 2022.
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to consult appropriate representatives and provide the required written information. It found that there was no recognised independent trade union, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, no section 188 representatives elected, no invitation to elect such representatives, and no individual consultation with the claimants about the proposed redundancies.
The Tribunal found the section 189 complaints well founded. It also found that the respondent had not shown special circumstances making compliance with section 188 not reasonably practicable, and that the complaints were presented in time. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and guidance in GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, it awarded the maximum protected period of 90 days for each claimant, beginning on 9 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The complaints were under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, alleging failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of redundancies. The remedy was a protective award equivalent to 90 days' remuneration for each claimant, but no monetary amount was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.