Case 1302714/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Haddow v The Famous Virgins & Castle Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1302714/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Haddow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response and entered no appearance. Following a Rule 21 hearing before Employment Judge Dean on 11 March 2024, the tribunal entered judgment for Mr L Haddow and upheld claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and holiday pay. The notice pay damages of £852.56 were calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the amount would be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay.
On the disability complaints, the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of bilateral impingement of the hip. It upheld the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability and the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments. The monetary heads of loss for the disability complaints were set out together: £6,306.15 for loss of earnings to the assessment date, £5,000.00 for injury to feelings, and £532.60 interest on the injury to feelings award.
The tribunal also upheld the unfair dismissal complaint. It awarded a basic award of £852.56 and a compensatory award of £22,166.56, and recorded a 25% uplift of £5,754.78 for non-compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 under s.207A of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The grand total ordered was £47,983.87.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 September 2021 to 5 December 2021; gross sum ordered. | Upheld | — | £4,814 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay damages; calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax on Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £853 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,705 |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability; monetary heads of loss were awarded together with the other disability complaint and not apportioned between them. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability; monetary heads of loss were awarded together with the other disability complaint and not apportioned between them. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £852.56 and compensatory award of £22,166.56, plus a 25% uplift for ACAS Code non-compliance quantified at £5,754.78. | Upheld | — | £28,774 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £47,984
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £853
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £22,167
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996
- s.123 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.