Case 1302757/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Smith v Modern Packaging Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302757/2023
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Chivers Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Midlands West Employment Tribunal by CVP on 10 August 2023 before Employment Judge Chivers. The claimant, Mr R Smith, did not attend. The respondent, Modern Packaging Limited, was represented by Sarah Head.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim was struck out because of non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders and because he failed to actively pursue the claim. No substantive findings on the merits of any pleaded claim are recorded in the written decision.
The decision note records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written record does not set out any compensatory or other monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action(s); it records that the claimant's claim was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders and for failure to actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.