Case 1302785/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Kayleigh Ivy Baxter v Europa Road Ltd PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 1302785/2024
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kayleigh Ivy Baxter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 25 July 2025, Employment Judge Gidney considered the claimant's applications dated 17 July 2025 to amend the claim form dated 15 February 2024. The tribunal refused the application to add an allegation of constructive dismissal as an incidence of direct disability discrimination.
The tribunal also refused the application to amend the claim form to include a claim of indirect disability discrimination. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days; no written reasons are included in the record provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Application dated 17 July 2025 to amend the Claim Form dated 15 February 2024 to include an allegation of constructive dismissal as an incidence of direct disability discrimination was refused. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Application dated 17 July 2025 to amend the Claim Form dated 15 February 2024 to include a claim of indirect disability discrimination was refused. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.