Case 1302799/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Cunniah v Romero Catholic Academy Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 1302799/2024
- Decision date
- 1 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Cunniah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, Employment Judge Kelly, sitting alone at the Midlands West Employment Tribunal by CVP on 1 November 2024, recorded a disability finding under the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held that Mr N Cunniah had a disability during the period 11 May 2023 to 27 October 2023 by reason of psoriatic arthropathy and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The tribunal also recorded that Mr Cunniah did not have a disability by reason of ischaemic heart disease or hypertension. The judgment does not determine any substantive discrimination, whistleblowing, unfair dismissal, or remedy issues, and it contains no award figures.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Consent judgment on a preliminary disability issue only. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had a disability under the Equality Act 2010 during 11 May 2023 to 27 October 2023 by reason of psoriatic arthropathy and Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and did not have a disability by reason of ischaemic heart disease or hypertension. No substantive liability or remedy was determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.