Case 1302806/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Kapoor v Express Vehicles Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1302806/2021
- Decision date
- 10 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Kapoor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Kapoor's claims against Express Vehicles Limited were heard by Employment Judge Hindmarch at Birmingham by CVP on 10 November 2021. The respondent did not appear, and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages and awarded £10,229.19. It also upheld the complaint of failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay and awarded £1,573.58.
The tribunal then uplifted the sums above by £1,923.08 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had failed to issue the claimant with written particulars of employment. No award was made for notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was upheld and £10,229.19 was awarded. | Upheld | — | £10,229 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay was upheld and £1,573.58 was awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,574 |
| Breach of contract | No award was made for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,726
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.