Case 1302826/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No in Attendance — 2019
- Case reference
- 1302826/2018
- Decision date
- 20 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 20 June 2019, Employment Judge Richardson heard evidence from the claimant, Mr J Hoult, with no respondent in attendance. The tribunal found that the claimant was, at the relevant time, an employee of the first respondent within section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for unpaid holiday pay well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim for breach of contract over notice pay well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the redundancy claim well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.