Case 1302875/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Przemyslaw Kawczynski v Winner Recruitment (Birmingham) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1302875/2018
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Przemyslaw Kawczynski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was listed to determine two preliminary issues: the claimant's employment status and whether he was a disabled person. Because there was insufficient time to deal with both issues, the tribunal proceeded only on status with the parties' agreement.
Employment Judge Meichen found that Mr Przemyslaw Kawczynski had worker status. He was found not to be self-employed and not to be an employee. The disability question under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 was left to a further preliminary hearing.
With the parties' agreement, the tribunal directed that a further preliminary hearing be listed on 30 April 2020 to decide whether the claimant was a disabled person. The judgment records that no further directions were needed because the parties had prepared to deal with the disability issue at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found the claimant had worker status and was neither self-employed nor an employee. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.