Case 1302899/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Davey v PMP Recruitment Limited CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2021
- Case reference
- 1302899/2021
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah Date
- Venue
- Birmingham West
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a certificate of correction under Rule 69 stating that the respondent's correct title is PMP Recruitment Limited. The case was heard at Birmingham West on 15 December 2021 before Employment Judge Mensah, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Paul Brill of Cordant Group.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's holiday pay claim and ordered PMP Recruitment Limited to pay £263.06 by no later than 4pm on 5 January 2022. It dismissed the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim, the separate sickness pay claim, and the claim for breach of contract under the disciplinary procedure.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The judgment therefore records the outcomes and award, but does not set out the tribunal's full written reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claimant's holiday pay claim and ordered payment of £263.06 by no later than 4pm on 05.01.2022. | Upheld | — | £263 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this separate unlawful deduction of wages claim as not made out. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as the claimant's sickness pay claim and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was said to arise under the disciplinary procedure and was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £263
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.