Case 1302921/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Bunn v Link Barbers Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302921/2022
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Bunn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningProceeding under Rule 21, Employment Judge Perry found that Miss C Bunn was dismissed in breach of contract on 6 May 2022. The tribunal ordered Link Barbers Ltd to pay £2,090.00 net damages for that breach.
The tribunal also held that Miss C Bunn was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,090.00, described in the judgment as 10 weeks' gross pay. It further found that the respondent had failed to compensate her for accrued holiday leave at termination and ordered £418.00 gross in respect of that entitlement.
Finally, the tribunal recorded that the respondent was in breach of its duty under section 1(1) and/or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and made an additional award of £418.00 gross under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The four sums recorded in the judgment total £5,016.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that Miss C Bunn was dismissed in breach of contract on 6 May 2022 and awarded £2,090.00 net damages. | Upheld | — | £2,090 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,090.00, described in the judgment as 10 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £2,090 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to compensate her for accrued holiday leave at termination and ordered £418.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £418 |
| Other | The tribunal recorded a breach of duty under section 1(1) and/or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered an additional two weeks' pay of £418.00 gross under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £418 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,016
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1(1) and/or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.