Case 1302926/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Perkins v T & T Group — 2024
- Case reference
- 1302926/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Perkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Perkins did not attend the hearing in Birmingham on 30 September 2024. Employment Judge Dimbylow recorded that, after considering the information available and making such enquiries as were practicable, and on the respondent's application, the claim was dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing. No written reasons were to be provided unless requested at the hearing, and no such request was made; a written request could also have been made within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. It records only that, after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and the tribunal made practicable enquiries, the claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.