Case 1302984/2023 · Employment Tribunal
MR VLAD MIHAILESCU v Orbital Gas Systems Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302984/2023
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N. Clarke Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR VLAD MIHAILESCU
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard at Midlands West by telephone, in private, on 1 November 2023 before Employment Judge N. Clarke. The claimant did not appear. The respondent appeared through Ms Danielle Harrison, HR Manager, and Mr Matthew Allen, Managing Director.
The judgment records only that "The claims are dismissed under Rule 47." It does not set out any findings on liability, and it does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 47. The judgment does not record any merits findings or separate remedy award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47. The judgment does not record any merits findings or separate remedy award for this claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 47. The judgment does not record any merits findings or separate remedy award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47. The judgment does not record any merits findings or separate remedy award for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.