Case 1302986/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Tracy Weaver v Leading Labels Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302986/2022
- Decision date
- 2 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Knowles
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Tracy Weaver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case on 27 September 2022 at Birmingham by Cloud Video Platform. The respondent did not file an ET3, had been given notice of the hearing, and did not attend. Employment Judge L Knowles sat alone, heard evidence from the claimant, and considered the bundle of documents.
The tribunal held that Mrs Tracy Weaver’s claim for unlawful deductions in respect of her holiday entitlement was well founded. It found that the gross sum due was £1,755.32.
The tribunal also found that the claim involved a grievance to which the ACAS Code applied, but the respondent did not deal with the grievance. For that reason, it applied a 25% uplift to the claimant’s compensation. The respondent was ordered to pay £2,194.15 in total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned unlawful deductions in respect of holiday entitlement. The tribunal found £1,755.32 was the gross sum due and applied a 25% uplift because the respondent did not deal with the grievance under the ACAS Code, producing a total order of £2,194.15. | Upheld | — | £2,194 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,194
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,194
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.