Case 1302998/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Nwokedi & Mr A Nwokedi (lay representatives] For the v Mr L Millington (solicitor) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302998/2022
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Nwokedi & Mr A Nwokedi (lay representatives] For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham on 2 and 3 February 2023 before Employment Judge Kenward sitting alone. The written record identifies Miss N Penado as the claimant and Rookery School as the respondent, and records appearances for both parties.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also held that the complaint of wrongful dismissal and non-payment of notice pay was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The written decision does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning. It notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment also describes this complaint as non-payment of notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.