Case 1303044/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr W Qaiser (2) Satvinder Billen (3) Zahid Saleem v West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303044/2023
- Decision date
- 22 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr W Qaiser (2) Satvinder Billen (3) Zahid Saleem
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal issued a strike-out judgment under rule 37. By a letter dated 27 September 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why their claims should not be struck out on the grounds that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, or that the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claims. The extracted text does not identify the substantive nature of the underlying claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claims in case nos. 1303044/2023, 1303045/2023 and 1303046/2023 were struck out under rule 37. It does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.