Case 1303049/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Dr R J Heal v University of Warwick and others (see annex A) Date: 6 May 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 1303049/2018
- Decision date
- 4 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr R J Heal
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a case management preliminary hearing on 5 February 2021, the Employment Judge notified the claimant by order dated 18 February 2021 that the tribunal was considering striking out the remaining Equality Act 2010 claims, whistleblowing claims under Part IVA Employment Rights Act 1996, and breach of contract claims under the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994. The claimant was told the proposed strike out was because the claims had no reasonable prospect of success, he had not complied with earlier tribunal orders, and the claims were not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not respond by the deadline of 4pm on 5 March 2021. He later sent an email on 26 March 2021 in relation to claims against Queen Mary University of London, but the tribunal found that response did not engage with the merits of the remaining claims identified in the earlier order and did not set out any arguable legal or factual basis for them.
The tribunal therefore struck out the remaining claims against the respondents listed in Annex A and dismissed them because they had no reasonable prospect of success, the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's orders of 24 December 2020 and 18 February 2021, and the claims were not being actively pursued. It also recorded that the claims were totally without merit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the remaining Equality Act 2010 claims arising from the claimant's employment or application for employment under Part 5 Equality Act 2010. The judgment did not identify the specific protected characteristic or sub-type of these claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal struck out the remaining whistleblowing claims under Part IVA Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the remaining breach of contract claims under the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- totally without merit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.