Case 1303062/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R O’Donnell v DHL Supply Chain Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303062/2021
- Decision date
- 10 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Choudry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R O’Donnell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the claimant's disability discrimination complaint at a remote hearing on 10 February 2023. Earlier case management orders had required the claimant to apply to amend and provide full particulars of that claim, because the claim form contained no substantive details of the alleged disability discrimination.
The respondent had applied to strike out the disability discrimination claim for non-compliance with those orders, and the tribunal had previously warned that strike out was being considered unless proper particulars were provided. At the hearing, however, the claimant stated that she did not wish to pursue the disability discrimination claim and confirmed that she wished to withdraw it immediately.
The tribunal accordingly dismissed the disability discrimination claim on withdrawal. The judgment also records that the holiday pay claim and the respondent's counterclaim were to proceed to a further hearing on 31 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal at the hearing. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.