Case 1303066/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Gill (son & lay representative) For the v Mrs C Thomas (HR advisor) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303066/2021
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Panel members
- Mr E Stanley, Mr J Reeves
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Gill (son & lay representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final merits hearing on 3 and 4 November 2022 before Employment Judge Perry, sitting with Mr E Stanley and Mr J Reeves, the tribunal found that Mr Jaswinder Gill’s complaint of unfair dismissal against Aeroplas (UK) Ltd was well founded. It awarded a basic award of £5,758.50, plus £350 for loss of statutory rights, and applied a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code, producing a total unfair dismissal award of £7,635.63.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had contravened Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010 and that the claimant had been subjected to discrimination in contravention of s.15 Equality Act 2010. On that claim, it awarded £9,100 for injury to feelings, reduced by 25% for failure to follow the ACAS Code to a subtotal of £6,825, and added £809 interest, making a total of £7,634.00.
The judgment records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £5,758.50, £350 for loss of statutory rights, and a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code, making £7,635.63. | Upheld | — | £7,636 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal awarded £9,100 for injury to feelings, reduced by 25% for failure to follow the ACAS Code, with £809 interest, making £7,634.00. | Upheld | Disability | £7,634 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,270
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,759
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.15 (something arising from) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.