Case 1303069/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Allaway (Legal Adviser) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303069/2023
- Decision date
- 15 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Allaway (Legal Adviser) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham on 14 and 15 August 2023 before Employment Judge Gaskell, heard the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against DHL Services Limited. The claimant was represented by Mr D Allaway and the respondent by Ms I Bayliss.
The tribunal decided that the claimant was fairly dismissed by the respondent. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the wrongful dismissal claim. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed and held the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.