Case 1303085/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N James v Sutda Cic — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303085/2022
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss N James's claim against SUTDA CIC. Employment Judge Connolly had issued a strike-out warning dated 13 January 2023, giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued and/or because she did not attend the preliminary hearing listed for that date.
The judgment records that the claimant did not make written representations, or did not make representations sufficient to prevent strike out, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive findings on the merits and no remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the strike-out reasons; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out after a warning about non-active pursuit and the claimant's non-attendance at the preliminary hearing on 13 January 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.