Case 1303089/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Afzal v Jobandtalent Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303089/2022
- Decision date
- 21 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Afzal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 November 2022, the tribunal gave Mr K Afzal an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that it had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that Mr Afzal did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary award, and it is signed by Employment Judge Dimbylow on 21 February 2023.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text does not enumerate the individual pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing categories for the case. The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out in full. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment text does not enumerate the individual pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing categories for the case. The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out in full. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment text does not enumerate the individual pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing categories for the case. The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out in full. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment text does not enumerate the individual pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing categories for the case. The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out in full. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.