Case 1303107/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Kelleher v Homes 2 Inspire Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1303107/2021
- Decision date
- 13 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Kelleher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham in private by telephone on 10 December 2021 before Employment Judge Connolly. The claimant, Mr N Kelleher, appeared in person and the respondent, Homes 2 Inspire Ltd, was represented by a solicitor.
The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his claim of discrimination, unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract, holiday pay, and any claim arising from events in his claim form relating to events on or about 25 October 2019 and his absence in February 2020. Those claims were therefore dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also states that this disposal did not affect the claimant's ability to pursue his other claims of discrimination, unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract in the above-numbered claim. No merits findings or remedy award are recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to a claim of discrimination, but the extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic or the exact statutory basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.