Case 1303124/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Branson v Bright Dawn Home Care — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303124/2022
- Decision date
- 8 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J. Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Branson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 April 2023, the Tribunal gave Ms M Branson an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal said the matter had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had not complied with the Order of 20 January 2023 requiring medical evidence to support her failure to attend the preliminary hearing.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Acting Regional Employment Judge J. Jones struck out the claim on 8 April 2024. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the underlying breach of contract or unlawful deduction from wages complaints, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify a separate outcome for this head; the claim was struck out in full. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify a separate outcome for this head; the claim was struck out in full. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.