Case 1303126/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Islam v Leigh Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303126/2022
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
- Panel members
- Mrs Hill, Mr Sharma
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Islam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham by CVP on 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13 November 2023, with judgment given on 11 January 2024 by Employment Judge Flood, sitting with Mrs Hill and Mr Sharma. The claimant was Mr M Islam and the respondent was Leigh Trust.
The judgment records that the claims of unfair dismissal under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, direct sex discrimination, and direct discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 did not succeed and were dismissed. The text supplied states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would be provided separately; no remedy was awarded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.