Case 1303128/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Windross (Counsel) For the v Mr R Taylor (Solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303128/2023
- Decision date
- 4 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Windross (Counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made pursuant to Rule 64 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure and by consent of the parties. It concerned the claimant's claims for unlawful deductions from wages, unpaid holiday pay, unpaid wages and unpaid expenses.
The tribunal recorded an award of £3,000 payable to the claimant by the respondent. No separate breakdown was given for the individual claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The consent judgment refers to claims for unlawful deductions from wages and unpaid wages. The award is not split by claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The consent judgment refers to unpaid holiday pay. The award is not split by claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | The consent judgment refers to unpaid expenses. No more specific claim type is stated and the award is not split by claim. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.