Case 1303145/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Childs v Learn by Design Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303145/2023
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kight Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Childs
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Childs appeared in person and the Respondent did not attend. At the hearing in Birmingham via CVP on 11 October 2023, Employment Judge Kight dealt with the Claimant’s redundancy payment claim and her claim for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The redundancy payment claim was dismissed because it was withdrawn by the Claimant. No further remedy was recorded for that claim.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. The amount recorded in the judgment was £100.90 gross.
The tribunal also recorded that no ACAS uplift was awarded in respect of non-compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement; the sum recorded was £100.90 gross. | Upheld | — | £101 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £101
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.